Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/32 Below (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  SilkTork  *YES! 00:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

32 Below (band)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

fails WP:MUSIC. Winning a competition to open for a second-rate country band is not the same as winning a notable competition/award. Ironholds (talk) 22:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:26, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC.  young  american  (wtf?) 00:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails the criteria put forth by our band notability guidelines. The group could hardly be considered notable enough for encyclopedic inclusion. –blurpeace (talk) 06:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSICBIO.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - no coverage in reliabble sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 14:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.