Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/35mm equivalent reproduction ratio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Macro photography. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

35mm equivalent reproduction ratio

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This article is on a concept or neologism of apparently insufficient notability. It should be covered in the article Macro photography instead of standalone. See discussion on its talk page. Dicklyon (talk) 15:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete and merge to Macro photography, as nominator. The article has since been moved to 35 mm equivalent magnification, in spite of my advice to wait for the AfD to conclude.  It's a better title, but no more notable.  Dicklyon (talk) 23:03, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and merged a few paragraphs into Macro photography. So we just need to make it a redirect now. Dicklyon (talk) 05:52, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I consolidated the information that was merged since there was some duplication. I moved the crop factor chart to the article Crop factor. As the author of this article, I have no problem with it being deleted now that the information has been merged with other articles. Thanks for your assistance, Dicklyon. If you don't mind handling the redirect I would be very grateful. DSiegfried (talk) 13:04, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I will do that if the closer of this AfD does not. Dicklyon (talk) 15:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment AFD is a bit of a labyrinth of rules and process and can be confusing for those not familiar with it. Guide to deletion provides some guidelines.  The Closing Admin  and other editors discussing this AFD should be aware that the article was moved from the original title, and that content has been merged elsewhere. -- Whpq (talk) 22:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.