Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/365 days photo project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Photo essay in lieu of deletion. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-08 08:48Z

365 days photo project

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be an article with no reliably published references available. Keep in mind that blogs aren't normally considered reliable publishers (see WP:ATT) and the only references I found for the phrase "365 days photo" appear to be a small handful of blogs. So not only does the article appear to fail both WP:N and it's proposed compliment WP:INCLUSION, but I'm not sure there are even any published references to find. Delete as unverifiable with published references, but will certainly reconsider down the line in the long run if the term catches on and is discussed in published media for citation. Dugwiki 19:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Many, MANY blog references, and I am aware of a similar phenomenon on YouTube (see this to see just how many there are) but I can see no decent sources. Keep if some can be found, certainly. J Milburn 19:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't see that many when I searched, but I could have screwed up my search. I wonder if part of the issue is the name of the article?  Is "365 days photo project" a standard name for it? Or does it go by other names? Are there some published references for this sort of thing under a different title? Dugwiki 20:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - I do not understand the point of this project. The article lacks cohesion, and fails to explain an already pointless and meaningless activity perhaps only carried out by a handful of individuals. - XX55XX 19:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.