Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3C (technology term)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. John Reaves (talk) 17:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

3C (technology term)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A quick search of various databases finds no use of the term Confidential Computer Credentials. The writer of the article states that it is an internal term used by his company, PC Perfecters. This is a contested proposed deletion. Spacepotato 23:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not for things made up in the server room one day. &mdash;dgies tc 00:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable. Sounds a little spammy also. --TeckWiz Parlate Contribs@ 00:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - It also seems like a dictionary definition, and sounds like advertising. -- Wenli 00:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems more like a fancy name for a common business practice.  What's the point? --Dennisthe2 01:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Mwelch 01:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fancy name for a piece of paper with user names and passwords written on it. (A bad security practice, really.) Per nom, no evidence that this term is used outside a single company. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 11:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per above, and I strongly suspect that this is a poorly disguised advertisement. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanispamvertising. Artw 14:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.