Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3D Issue


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:18, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

3D Issue

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NOTDIRECTORY with a pretty poor set of PR based references, and one big deal. WP:NCORP is debatable. Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 08:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 08:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 08:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 08:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 08:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 08:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 08:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete- promotional article, does not meet WP:NCORP. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NCORP. Spleodrach (talk) 09:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Brycehughes (talk) 11:14, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Do not see how WP:GNG or WP:NCORP are met. The subject is a 25-person company (max) covered in a half-dozen ROTM news stories (max). A WP:BEFORE search in the Irish Times, for example, returns just 4 results. One of which is a passing mention, two of which are effective overlaps, and the final of which is a republished press-release. A similar search in the Silicon Republic Irish tech news source, by comparison, also returns just a handful of results. All but one of which are passing mentions, and the single 'primary topic' example is the same "republished press release as news churnalism" we see in the Irish Times. In terms of notability, I'm just not seeing it. There is nothing to distinguish this 25-person software company from the other many (10,000? 100,000?) such companies anywhere on the planet. Otherwise, the content reads like an extension of the subject's own website (complete with product promo, leadership bios, and "company press release complete with flowery quotes" style content). Mine is a firm "delete" recommendation. Guliolopez (talk) 00:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.