Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3D Videoconference


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Videoconferencing. (and delete original contents) Courcelles 05:02, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

3D Videoconference

 * – ( View AfD View log )

blatant spam describing a single product, just read the first line of the 2nd paragraph. speedy declined Wuh  Wuz  Dat  17:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:21, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Obviously a 3D videoconference is possible, or will be soon anyway. It is not so clear that it will be a notable topic as distinct from plain old videoconference. This article mainly talks about the technology of 3D video, a topic that should be covered in other articles already. Borock (talk) 17:07, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I declined the speedy delete on this. The article does seem to focus on a single implementation, but doesn't actually name a company or product. Its a copy and translation from the Spanish Language wiki es:Videoconferencia 3D. --GraemeL (talk) 17:18, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per my comment above. Article is not promotional, it's in the process of being converted from Spanish language wiki to here. --GraemeL (talk) 22:33, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * (borderline) Keep - I looked at the article first and felt that I could not justify speedy deletion. It does need serious cleanup though, particularly on context. Deb (talk) 18:24, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, this entry is about a particular attempt at 3D conferencing, with no evidence of notability. Appears to be only a research project at the moment. Appearing on the Spanish language wiki is not evidence of notability. Hairhorn (talk) 13:17, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:12, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete I agree with the promotional intent. Although this appears on several Wikipedias, it was written (at least substantially) by the same user on all 3.  Looking over the article, its just not worth saving: it has very limited notability, it is largely unsourced (and perhaps unsourceable), and it isn't written in encyclopedic tone.  Even if (and this is a big if) the subject were notable it would still need a complete overhaul.  Them  From  Space  18:20, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Videoconferencing. Per Hairhorn, it's unencyclopedic: it's about a specific theoretical implementation. There's no evidence of WP:N or WP:V. --Pnm (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.