Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3Dchat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:02, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

3Dchat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Written like a promotional website article. References are poor, and written like paid press coverage. Light21 07:14, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * delete - all RSes (that still exist) are publicity around the launch - probably not paid, but also very aspirational as far as actually documenting the thing itself - David Gerard (talk) 15:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: This seems like the best reference, but I'm not finding much else besides that. Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. Safehaven86 (talk) 21:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - article does not assert notability independent of other social media sites. The only source, as linked above by Safehaven86, does not establish independent notability seeing as how its the only independent source which talks about 3Dchat. —Mythdon 09:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly advertorial content. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:09, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.