Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3E Accounting Private Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nakon 03:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

3E Accounting Private Limited

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An accountancy firm, which doens't appear to have received any independent 3rd party coverage by WP:NCORP. I am very suspicious about paid editing in this case given the large number of similar articles produced by what appears to be a WP:SOCKFARM. Le petit fromage (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I've fixed the AFD as as seen here it all appeared to have went wrong ..... – Davey 2010 Talk 18:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment. This is one of the articles connected to Articles for deletion/Elvin Aghayev and Sockpuppet investigations/Khangrah, although the subject matter appears unrelated and no socks have appeared here yet. I share the cheese's suspicions about paid editing, giving the pattern of unrelated topics in the SPI. Note also that the related article 3E Accounting was deleted last November per WP:CSD. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:29, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 1 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. The Times link is just to a business directory, and the Singapore Business Review link is to something that does not appear to be about this company. The remaining sources look worse. So we don't have the multiple reliable, independent, in-depth sources required by WP:ORG. And as I already stated above the pattern of editing in the SPI makes me suspicious of paid editing. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.