Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3M High Visibility Signals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NativeForeigner Talk 05:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

3M High Visibility Signals

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not able to find reliable, secondary sources meeting WP:GNG. There may be specialist sources, however, although there's already several paragraphs (none of them sourced) at traffic signal, so I don't believe that a merge, or at least much of one, there is warranted. j⚛e deckertalk 04:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination and failing WP:GNG and WP:VER. Notability on why a specific signal should merit its own stand-alone article not established. Blue   Riband►   12:11, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 2 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Go ahead and delete - There doesn't seem to be enough for a detailed article, with this being the only result I've found. SwisterTwister   talk  21:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.