Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3Quarter-Aiming


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:08, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

3Quarter-Aiming

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable. Although it appears to be satisfactorily referenced, there are multiple problems with the references. Three are from the website itself, four are from forum posts, and 3 are unverifiable (including a completely broken, possibly fabricated link). The only claim of notability that may hold any water is the world record claim (which I've been unable to verify), and doesn't even guarantee notability. &mdash; Ledgend  Gamer  01:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment from nom - Additionally, having played the games myself, I strongly suspect that the claim of 46 full-time graphic designers, developers and coders is complete bogus. &mdash; Ledgend  Gamer  01:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find any coverage whatsoever of this company (or its games, for that matter) in a reliable source.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 01:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 03:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  23:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.