Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3 Punters - Masti Unlimited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

3 Punters - Masti Unlimited

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced article about a non-notable future film. Fails WP:GNG.- MrX 20:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC) - MrX 20:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. - MrX 20:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. - MrX 20:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete As stated here Teahouse/Questions the article is a piece of WP:SELFPROMOTION by a WP:COI and WP:SPA account. The youtube link simply confirms this. Should the film ever achieve notability in secondary sources down the road it can be recreated. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 20:54, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete At best WP:TOOSOON. At worst WP:SELFPROMOTION with a WP:COI. In either case it should be deleted. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:42. This and WP:TOOSOON were explained at the Teahouse. Arjayay (talk) 08:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.