Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3 boroughs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete both. MuZemike 07:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

3 boroughs

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a bad title, one of the reasons I PRODded this in the first place--prod removed by author without explanations. Now that the number is corrected, the title makes even less sense--but to put it blandly, that an area have a certain number of boroughs (or skyscrapers, lakes, etc.) is no reason to have an article called "3 boroughs," even if it were three. Drmies (talk) 03:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A1/A3 - This article does not contain sufficient context for me to identify the subject of the article. Also, this article does not appear to contain any meaningful content.  (Further concerns are that it does not assert notability, contain any sources, or provide sufficient information to allow other editors to meaningfully expand or improve the article.) - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:47, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Adding 10 boroughs, also de-prodded, basically same reasoning. If someone can verify this information, then it should go into the main article for Gandhinagar district. Delete both per nom.--Chaser2 (talk) 05:01, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm not a fan of one AfD hitting multiple articles (too easy to confuse issues) but for what it's worth my Speedy Delete vote above would also apply to 10 boroughs, for the same reasons. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:30, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It's part of WP:BUNDLE for articles with the same content but different titles.--Chaser2 (talk) 14:53, 27 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks Chaser. I hadn't thought of combining them, and I also am not generally in favor of that, but here it seems appropriate. I think there ought to be some speediable way to get rid of an article like 3 boroughs, certainly the way it looked originally. Drmies (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete but add verified information to Gandhinagar district. According to the article about the district, there are "three boroughs" rather than ten, and the other seven are cities.  No merge, since it's an unlikely search term.  Mandsford (talk) 17:24, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.