Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3 easy typical food of Peru


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedied G11  by RHaworth (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion). Housekeeping closure. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 23:45, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

3 easy typical food of Peru

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not suitable for inclusion. —> εϻαd ιν  ΤαΙk Ͼδητrιβμτιoης 16:06, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Was going to AFD this myself until I noticed it had already been patrolled. Support deletion. Shrug-shrug (talk) 16:28, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:29, 17 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I hate to say it, because this is obviously an initial, good faith contribution, but speedy delete; I assume we have a standard Peruvian cuisine article, so this is a duplicate content fork. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:29, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Yet another article showing why we need a "blatant WP:NOT violation" reason for CSD. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:06, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Duplication of an existing topic, as mentioned above. Any valid content in this article can easily be merged elsewhere, and does not require a stand-alone article. -- WikHead (talk) 18:03, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Tom Morris, we do need a WP:NOT reason, duplication, content fork of Peruvian Cuisine, WP:OR, I could go on. -- Alexf(talk) 18:16, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.  M    Magister Scienta talk  (17 November 2011) 
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.