Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3dmm

3dmm
3dmm was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was merge with 3D Movie Maker.

I cleaned away all the crap, and now we have an article on a product that nobody cares about. I hate to waste all that work, but delete. hfool 20:52, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Abstain. While I take your point, "It won several industry awards" suggests notability. Anybody know which specific awards it won? [[User:David_Johnson|David Johnson [ T|C ] ]] 23:12, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I'd agree nobody cares about it. 73,000 Google hits for 3dmm isn't insignificant, and indeed it appears to have a cult following. Keep and perhaps one of those cultists will show up to improve it. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:38, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, move to proper title (i.e., full name). Mikkalai 02:29, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Um, redirect to 3D Movie Maker? Niteowlneils 03:08, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Agree with this redirect. [[User:Livajo|&#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#9786;]] 07:21, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Um, duh. Yeah, redirect. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 21:21, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * This article doesn't describe 3D Movie Maker, a notable product, itself. Redirect.  [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 02:01, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.