Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3oclockfuntime


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete by JzG as patent nonsense (Non-administrator closing). --Tikiwont 15:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

3oclockfuntime

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Very little substance, seems to be neologism.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 13:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Completely unsourced neologism. --Ginkgo100talk 13:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.