Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3rd November (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability not established. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 10:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

3rd November (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFF with no secondary sources confirming that principal photography has commenced. I can only find one piece of press coverage, a July 9 article which does not mention filming having begun. McGeddon (talk) 08:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, does not meet WP:NFF or WP:GNG, is yet to be released and production has not been notable, may be a case of WP:PROMOTION as article created by WP:SPA user:Presentbypriteshjoshi that is a coproducer of this film. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * For some reason that name seems really familiar, like they'd tried making stuff here before. I'm not finding anything right off, but it's just sticking in my head for some reason. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. It looks like that so far there's only been one article written, which was distributed by IANS. This isn't enough to justify an article on here. I'm also concerned at the amount of unsourced content in the article, as we have nothing to substantiate that any of this is true - especially things like the claim that one actress bailed on the film because of her busy work schedule. If this was written by the producer then that'd make sense that they have this knowledge, but we still need independent RS to show notability and back up claims. There's a version in the draftspace at User:Presentbypriteshjoshi/sandbox that can be incubated until the film gains enough coverage to pass NFILM, so there's no need to move this particular article anywhere for anyone to work on. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:07, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.