Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3rd Pride of Britain Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 02:41, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

3rd Pride of Britain Awards

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsure of notablity enough to justify full article. Shouldnt it be merged with parent article? Ditto for the rest of year-wise named Pride of Britain Awards TheOriginalSoni (talk) 12:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep The year-wise series are supplemental to the main article, and contain information of interest (e.g. award winners for the year) that would clog up the the main article. Niado (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I doubt it. There can be a separate List of winners of Pride of Britain Awards article if that is the only thing that needs to be there in the article. As for the rest of the details, I dont see how the Pride of Britain article cannot include that. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 14:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  15:30, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Procedural keep Either nominate them all or nominate none: the rationale would apply equally. In principle, these could be legitimate articles, but they have no sources and little content. It's probably best to userfy them and then move them back. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I intended to nominate all of them, but I am not sure if and how to make multiple nominations. So I decided to nominate one of them, and have the discussion include all of them. If anyone can include the rest of them too, it would be nice. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 14:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. The awards event is notable. Whether we should have separate articles for each year can be discussed on the article talk page(s). As even the nominator doesn't appear to favour deletion, this is the wrong venue. I would favour Googling and adding a few sources over userfying.--Michig (talk) 20:08, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep -- we do not allow award categories, necouraging listifying, so that we should keep the list articles. We might mige all the Pride of Britian Awards into one article, but it would be too large to be convenient.  Peterkingiron (talk) 20:21, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.