Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4.16 Enoch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P | Talk 09:31, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

4.16 Enoch
A page about a school class. Not even a school, just a class. JoanneB 17:43, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Does anyone apart from your own classmates actually bother about a single class, especially when it is insignificant and is about to break up? This is a public domain and not your school domain. Maybe get your school to host your class website instead? 11:26, 8 October 2005 (UTC) - Lowzeewee
 * Delete for obvious vanity. [[User:Consequencefree| Ardent &dagger; &isin; ]] 11:26, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A class that apparently doesn't even exist any more? Flapdragon 12:10, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Keep this site! It rocks! 4.16 is easily the best class in our school! bucksuck 11:26, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * (preceding unsigned comment by ) . User blanked this page and replaced content with above comment. Reverted and transposed the comment. --GraemeL (talk) 12:34, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity. --GraemeL (talk) 12:34, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * keep. One man's poison is another man's wine. My intention was not to establish this as a "look at me" wiki but i guess it ended up the same. A class. Yes indeed a class, a class not known to you per say but known to a great many else. Perhaps it is beyond you to realise that i have no intent in arguing with you over the existence of this wiki. frankly, it matters not to me but members of my class, school and even country. if, of course, you still feel that your opinion matters more then let it be,--Loke253 12:42, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Above comment was posted blanking all other comments on this page again. --GraemeL (talk) 12:45, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   13:34, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, a class of Wikipedia vandals is not notable. -- Egil 15:38, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- ( &#x263A; drini &#x266B; | &#x260E; ) 15:49, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete NN junk--Rogerd 19:04, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep all Biblical verses Delete. Grutness...  wha?  23:05, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Look, Kappa, a new challenge!! And wouldn't it be nice if even one in a hundred school articles had this much information? (BTW, this vote is entirely facetious, and intended only to provoke. Sorry.) Delete, and I pray that Wikipedia has not come to the point where articles on individual school classes are deemed worthy of inclusion. Denni &#9775;  00:43, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * That's unfair to Kappa and uncalled-for. Uncle G 04:43, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I second that. --Jacquelyn Marie 23:08, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * You're quite right. It was rude and I apologise. Denni &#9775; 23:37, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Junk Extensive SchoolCruft --JAranda &#124; yeah 04:27, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The article cites no sources, and I can find no sources to back up anything at all in the article, even the very existence of its subject. This article is unverifiable.  Presuming that such a class actually exists nonetheless, Wikipedia requires that knowledge about it (such as a detailed history like the one given here) be published elsewhere, other than Wikipedia, first, and be subject to peer review and acceptance by others.  The place for this article is the school's own web site or the author's own web site.  Wikipedia is not a primary source, nor is it a free wiki host. Delete. Uncle G 04:43, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. In what way is this encylopedic? Vegaswikian 05:29, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A class in the school is not an encyclopedic topic. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:59, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable; nevertheless, I am impressed with the amount of content here! If only people would write this much on notable topics.... --Jacquelyn Marie 23:08, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A particular class is surely unencylopedic. I consider it to be nonsense and vanity. *drew 10:41, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity Masterhatch 10:52, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonsense, not NPOV, and not notable. Also see 2L 2005 for similar article, also vfd'ed. bjelleklang 17:45, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.