Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/404 attacks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

404 attacks

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreferenced, appears to be a WP:OR essay analyzing the origins of this apparently unsourceable meme. Kinu t/c 23:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No context (when / where) and no information that can be verified Clovis Sangrail (talk) 00:34, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't make out from the text what this is supposed to be about, and according to the creator's comment on the article talk page, it's supposed to be a secret. In this respect they have been spectacularly successful: no Google hits at all (outside Wikipedia). --Lambiam 08:51, 17 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 17:20, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 17:20, 17 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:OR grows inexorably without commensurate addition of any useful secondary sources. Elizium23 (talk) 17:57, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Incoherent and unverified. Either the author is pulling our collective leg, or else (I'm trying to WP:AGF) he/she is writing about a concept so obscure that it fails Wikipedia's criteria for notability. --MelanieN (talk) 15:26, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.