Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4077

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was ambiguous. Failing to reach a clear concensus to delete, the decision defaults to keep. Note: There does appear to be concensus that if kept, the article should remain as a redirect. Rossami (talk) 02:48, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

4077
I can't imagine there being a need for an article on either the year or the number, and the link to MASH seems tenuous. RickK 07:04, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * It was a harmless redirect to the TV series until recently; I've changed it back to redirect to M*A*S*H (disambig). sjorford// 09:41, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete the redirect. --BM 11:39, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, until someone actually writes an article on the number 4077 :) j/k. Megan1967 01:33, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect I'd suggest making it a disambig page, but I can't think of any other uses of the number 4077 besides in the context of M*A*S*H. Is anything important scheduled to happen in 4077? --TenOfAllTrades 16:08, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect, agree with TenOfAllTrades. -- Jmabel | Talk 04:59, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, maintain current redirect, until it needs expansion (approximately 2,070 years from now). Keith D. Tyler  [ flame ]  22:56, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete the redirect. --Neigel von Teighen 22:59, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to M*A*S*H, link is not tenuous, the 4077 was the unit it revolved around. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 20:29, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.