Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/40 Glocc (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 02:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

40 Glocc
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not terribly notable. References are mostly youtube, myspace, and some gossip site. SXT40 07:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I just went through all the criteria listed in WP:MUSIC and this article doesn't solidly satisfy any of them. Considering the number of edits it has, one would think that anything possibly conferring notability would be in the article by now. I actually tagged it A7 before clicking the history tab and seeing that it has been around a while. Deranged bulbasaur 07:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are some underground artists who are notable before their first major album (see Papoose (rapper)) but this doesn't appear to be the case. He may run with G-Unit but that doesn't necessarily make him notable enough for inclusion in this project yet. Issues with references and style in the article contribute to the problems. - RPIRED 12:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, no reliable sources, no notability even asserted. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 16:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and suggest reviewing the entire G-Unit cluster of articles and categories. While I appreciate the enthusiasm that went into constructing that particular walled garden, every person who's ever crossed paths with a G-Unit member doesn't suddenly become notable. Otto4711 16:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no citations, no sources, the only referances are myspace and youtube and we all know how helpful those can be. -- ♫Twinkler4♫   (Talk to me!)  23:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep 40 Glocc is in the All Music Guide: thats typically enough for someone to pass WP:MUSIC criteria. Clean it up, add some references, but the notability bar appears to be passed.   ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 07:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - WP:MUSIC suggests using AMG as a resource for musicians. It in no way states that inclusion in AMG means that the artist passes. Otto4711 21:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. 40 Glocc is a well known rapper and all the article needs is a bit of clean up and afew more references, which i would help with. - Real Compton G 19:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP and automatically discount any sort of "so-and-so is a well known rapper" comments which are not backed up by reliable third party sources. Burntsauce 18:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per above. --- Realest4Life 18:14, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.