Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/40 Years: A Charlie Brown Christmas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  03:49, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

40 Years: A Charlie Brown Christmas

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet either WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM, aside from the ubiquitous AllMusic listing (similar to a film being listed on imdb.com), there is the listing in discogs, and a review from a non-reliable source (those reviews are provided by members).  Onel 5969  TT me 00:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - Article has three critical sources and is linked to numerous other categories. All About Jazz is considered a significant source for jazz. Subject matter is based on one of the top selling holiday albums of all time, making it quite significant—compared to, say The Jethro Tull Christmas Album, Jazz Mission to Moscow, Suite for Pops, Penny Lane & Time, Our Mann Flute, et al. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk)
 * Keep - We've been through the AllMusic thing plenty of times; see their entry on this list and the three linked discussions. They are sloppy with metadata like genre and album length, but their reviews written by staff members have been deemed reliable for our purposes again and again. And this album got one of those, not the mere "ubiquitous" entry as said dismissively by the nominator. All About Jazz is highly respected as well, as said by the person above. (Also note that the album was covered in a pro article at Jazz Times but its quality is unknown because the site requires a subscription). ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:38, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep the article has plenty of reliable reviews and I can't see any reason to delete it. BuySomeApples (talk) 02:15, 23 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.