Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/411mania (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. MastCell Talk 22:39, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

411mania

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Kept by default last year, but no evidence of continuing notice. The cited mentions are trivial (and two of them are now 404). Does not appear to have been the primary subject of any non-trivial independent coverage. Notability is not inherited; participation by some people of some degree of notability does not confer notability on this site. All content appears to be written from personal knowledge of the site, not from any external analysis of it. Guy (Help!) 08:34, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: The previous AfD is at Articles for deletion/411mania. I've renamed this nomination accordingly.--Tikiwont 09:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)--Tikiwont 09:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weakish delete Only passing references (not primary subject) at cited sources. Notability claims based on primary source Web traffic report, thus fails WP:N. I don't like the idea of deleting as it does seem popular. -- Kl4m  T C 16:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no sourced claims to meeting WP:WEB criteria. Eluchil404 21:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:WEB the passing mentions in mainstream media come nowhere near that threshold, which we have for a reason. Carlossuarez46 21:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.