Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/41 Ursae Majoris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of stars in Ursa Major. Consensus is the star is not independently notable/deserving of a standalone article. Star  Mississippi  14:51, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

41 Ursae Majoris

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Back on March 20, 2019 I tagged this article with a notability template after a failed search for indications of notability. This was removed on April 24 with the message "notability established by HR catalog number". I performed another search today, but it remains non-notable. All of the sources provided are in the nature of large-scale studies; there doesn't appear to be significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. The WP:NASTCRIT guideline suggests it is "presumed" notable, but it clearly fails to satisfy WP:GNG and thus should be deleted and possibly replaced by a redirect. Praemonitus (talk) 15:39, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Praemonitus (talk) 15:43, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect 6.4 magnitude, so not really a naked eye candidate in most cases. The YBS (HR) catalog carries a far smaller presumption of notability than smaller lists, IMO, and I agree there's no other evidence of independent notability. PianoDan (talk) 17:23, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing interesting or remarkable about this star. Nwhyte (talk) 19:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of stars in Ursa Major. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 17:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect per SevenSpheresCelestia. Heartmusic678 (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of stars in Ursa Major. Not notable enough for a stand alone article, but it is part of a notable list of stars. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.