Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/41st Avenue (Vancouver)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

41st Avenue (Vancouver)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Declined PROD. The subject of the article is a fairly unremarkable local street that runs through a suburban area of Vancouver. Has very few non-routine mentions in Vancouver news sources, let alone anything non-local, and the information in the article is already present in other articles, or could be contained in neighborhood entries.  Sounder Bruce  06:27, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  Sounder  Bruce  06:28, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions.  Sounder  Bruce  06:28, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's a significant road, both for transportation and for shopping. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:13, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Is a fairly significant road and the main road of Kerrisdale. The article is not written too well but deletion is not based on crappy writing, of which this article is not crappy but needs work. There should be standardisation because road articles of this type of road is usually allowed but in Wikipedia some semi-famous people are deleted while TV episode articles are kept. Not very consistent. This article meets the requirements of being kept. Aerostar3 (talk) 03:46, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Ignoring the rambling in the second sentence, none of the sources so far have demonstrated clear notability per WP:GNG or project guidelines like those at WP:USST (which, despite being a U.S. project still has valid guidelines for Canadian roads).  Sounder Bruce  03:53, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete It may be a significant road but it's not so significant as to have received signficant coverage, and in the absence of that there's nothing signficiant we can write an article about.Pontificalibus 07:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - stated it well. We have notability guidelines to ensure a solid verifiable article can be written. John from Idegon (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete – Not notable in and of itself. Obviously it is discussed in transit-related articles but that doesn't give it notability on its own terms. —Joeyconnick (talk) 06:05, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:48, 9 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Being a busy road does not make it notable. Sources do not discuss the road itself rather transit along it. Reywas92Talk 17:33, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GEOROAD. ——  SerialNumber  54129  09:42, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable suburban arterial road.  Dough   4872   00:48, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Pontificalibus. - GretLomborg (talk) 20:10, 13 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.