Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/42 Disambiguous

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 20:06, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

42 Disambiguous

 * Has only one use other than the year, and the year has a link to it saying "Alternate uses: see 42 Disambiguous". Why can't we just have the header say "Alternate use: 42 (number)" and then have this redundant article deleted?? Georgia guy 14:30, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and on the 42 page use the Number_42 redirect to 42 (number). (This is what is done on the 41, 40, 39, ... pages, so the revision would be consistent.) :) &mdash; RJH 14:58, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * ... or simply revert the edits by Jtkiefer to these versions, which use the template, as I have just done. Uncle G 02:47, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)
 * Neutral I did this originally in the hope that there would me more examples of 42 that could be added and linked to by the disambiguous page (and yes I'm sure there are other uses) though I understand why it may be unneccessary so either way is ok with me. Jtkiefer 21:03, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm sure there are other uses &mdash; Please describe one for us. Uncle G 02:47, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)
 * Del; besides the incorrect, and thereby misleading and confusing title, the precedent cited by RJHall is sound. --Jerzy·t 01:35, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .