Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/42 Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:52, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

42 Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Declined PROD. PROD reason was: "An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine funding notices and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Jason389 with no other contributions outside this topic. Does not meet WP:NCORP." Decliner made no edits addressing problems in article. Quick WP:BEFORE shows only press releases and churnalism. I endorse 's PROD. David Gerard (talk) 21:48, 29 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:SIGCOV in my opinion. Despite the article in financial post, I see no specific reason why this company is notable enough. Roxiehart1903 (talk) 09:26, 30 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:50, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:50, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:50, 29 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: confirming my PROD. No notability here; promo 'cruft. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: The 42technology.com described in the article as launching FuseOhm for electricity monitoring in the UK does not appear to be the same as the 42technologies.com US fashion industry BI company who were the original topic on the article. AllyD (talk) 07:12, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Searches find coverage of the start-up proposition, placing as a finalist for a start-up award in their field, and the company founders appearing on a Retail and Ecommerce 30 Under 30 list , but I don't see these as sufficient for the WP:NCORP criteria. AllyD (talk) 07:55, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.