Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/431 (number)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was restore redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to 400 (number). (non-admin closure) SWinxy (talk) 20:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

431 (number)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

As per WP:Number, and cross checking with 400 (number), this number is already listed on the list of interesting numbers in the 400s, and this article doesn't add much. While I must admit I did not go through the whole process of WP:1729, there is nothing much new added by this article to the list of numbers in the 400s that are interesting. Nerd1a4i (they/them) (talk) 18:57, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Nerd1a4i (they/them) (talk) 18:57, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and restore original redirect to 400 (number) per WP:TNT. There may well be interesting properties of 431 but none of the present article is salvageable. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:12, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 400 (number). Correct me if I'm very wrong but there's zero point in deleting it if you're just going to create and redirect it again.-- The Tips  of   Apmh  22:11, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Deleting it makes it much more difficult to dredge material out of the page history, which can be desirable if nothing in that page history is suitable. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 13:54, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. I believe that it satisfies the criteria for Wikipedia articles about numbers. Madison Elizabeth Michelle (talk) 20:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Could you expand on why? If you give a few starting points it'll be easier for me to look into/potentially expand into a full article. Nerd1a4i (they/them) (talk) 00:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 400 (number). "431 is very fun!"? Is this a joke?  Liliana UwU  (talk / contribs) 21:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. Nothing so offensive that the history needs to be deleted, yet nothing so interesting that there is even a plausible argument for a stand-alone article. Walt Yoder (talk) 23:34, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * delete per nom, nothing to save there. Artem.G (talk) 09:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. Cinadon36 18:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 400 (number) as a WP:ATD: the article is not worth keeping but redirecting feels better than deletion in this case. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 18:47, 31 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.