Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/438 wrestling hotlines in Detroit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was deleted by User:Gogo Dodo. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 03:46Z 

438 wrestling hotlines in Detroit

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is confusing. I know what it's about, but I can't figure out why it would belong in an encyclopedia. I assume the numbers in the article are long-dead (didn't try any of them; the article says they are), so it's not WP:ADS/db-spam stuff. It's not db-web because it's not a website, and I don't think db-corp or db-group could be stretched to cover it. So, brought here for your consideration. Probably WP:OR, not obviously WP:N, although I may be looking for entirely the wrong stuff. Any historians of Detroit wrestling hotlines in the house? Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Soltak | Talk 22:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete as Original Research, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, not notable, not verifiable, and it is a recreation of previously deleted material (2 speedy deletions on February 6th under CSD G1). Scottmsg 23:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In that case, I strongly recommend that this article be salted after deletion. Soltak | Talk 23:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * If it's deleted, future recreations which are "substantially similar" (I read that as "similar in substance", but some people might think that the intention is "pretty much the same") can be speedily deleted under WP:CSD G4. Three deletions isn't usually enough to justifying protecting the deleted page. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. Author's blanked the page with a request that it be deleted. Nobody else has edited the article significantly, so a speedy seems to be in order. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 04:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.