Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/45005

45005 was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE I thought there would be no pages for postcodes. JFW | T@lk  16:59, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete JFW | T@lk  16:59, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * comment: article content has been removed by original poster, comments in history indicate it could be speedied. Ianb 20:51, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Yes, but is it indeed policy not to have Zip code articles? JFW | T@lk  21:00, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I hope so, and if there isn't one, it's time to create one ;-). This article BTW would not stand anyway, it does no justice to other connotations of that fine set of digits.Ianb 21:24, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete before it spreads. RickK 06:34, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. jni 08:48, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Good. Can we also get rid of 90210? ;-) func(talk) 02:41, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gamaliel 05:53, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * D That some people in the UK will move down the street if it means going from CF62 to CF1 (now CF10/11) to improve their social standing is already bad enough. Chris 07:04, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Postal code information doesn't belong on Wikipedia in this format. --Improv 14:21, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I choke to say KEEP, but postal codes and high schools seem to be inviolate. 01:17, 2004 Oct 15 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.