Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/452nd Engineer Detachment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:21, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

452nd Engineer Detachment
Delete - Unit is a detachment, can't find anything about it on the internet at all. No reason given for notability, unit size, mission history, etc not given. Since I can't find anything about this unit at all, I don't think it can be expanded. Detachments are usually about platoon size, not a large formation Nobunaga24 01:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If a former soldier thinks it's not notable, who am I to argue?  I'll agree with the expert opinion. Brian G. Crawford 01:41, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Bucketsofg 03:06, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:40, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nomination. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 04:02, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom.  K ilo-Lima|(talk) 13:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  14:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Ter e nce Ong 14:39, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Sir! ProhibitOnions 20:08, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I vote to delete any article that could be written by a member of the unit no matter how notable it is. In fact, just as a general philosophy, if it has'nt already gotten a red link somewhere on wikipedia, I doubt the article should be written at all. For instance, there is no merit to allow me to write an article on my college dorm building. It is simply not notable enough, as is this article. Pal5017 23:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Cool3 02:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 05:19, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.