Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/454 Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per G11 by JzG. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 08:40, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

454 Entertainment

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

pure unadulterated spam, speedy declined Wuh  Wuz  Dat  07:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I took a second look at the article as I'm the person who originally declined the speedy deletion, and I don't see any notability in any chart singles. It could've easily fit A7 in my opinion. There is quite a fair bit of spam as well, but no pronouns were included to make me wonder if speedy deletion was necessary. Minima  c  ( talk ) 08:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Could not find any indication of notability using online resource either. Aeonx (talk) 09:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete spam too  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  15:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.