Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/454 Life Entertainment (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

454 Life Entertainment
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable record label that falls well short of WP:GNG. The only WP:SIGCOV is from press releases and self-posts on YouTube. Everything else is passing mentions or from blogs and sources that are not WP:RS. Even the MTV reference is a reprint from a website that no longer exists. FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 19:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note - Also looks like the second nomination. A comment from 2010 says that "The creator claims the media has not gotten around to cover them." Three years later it looks like they still haven't gotten around to it.--FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 19:47, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  20:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete As I mentioned when tagging it for notability, none of the sources pass wikipedia reliable source guidelines, and my searching did not turn up any reliable sources. As far as I can tell, it is currently non-notable and, as stated last time it was nominated for deletion, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so potential future notability is irrelevant. Ethraen (talk) 01:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, no significant coverage found in any non-primary reliable sources, therefore the subject fails WP:GNG and thus would not qualify as notable per WP:ORG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 11:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.