Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/46664 (number)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 00:59, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

46664 (number)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As a number, this is completely unnotable. It looks to me like this article only exists because 46664 is also the prison number of Nelson Mandela. But that's to do with him, not the number. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:11, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 19.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  00:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete We don't have individual pages for most numbers this high, and there's nothing here that proves this is anything except a run-of-the-mill number.Beerest355 Talk 02:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. An article on a number?  This really must be a joke.  NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 02:17, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * "NintendoFan", you display your ignorance. No one (except you?) would suggest that 1729 (number) should be deleted.  And we have others like those. Michael Hardy (talk) 15:12, 21 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - not notable as a number. Ansh666 06:33, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note, not useful as redirect due to disambig in title. Ansh666 06:34, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete this number per nom - it's so unusual... WP:NUMBER --みんな空の下 (トーク) 06:44, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - appears to fail WP:WINI. ö   Brambleberry   of   RiverClan  16:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and comments. That being said there are a whole lot of these based on OR of every time a given number has appeared in a movie or a book.  Agricolae (talk) 18:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 46664 (concerts) VQuakr (talk) 19:58, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't see a need for this redirect - I doubt anyone is going to type "46664 (number)" if they are looking for the concerts. However, if 46664 (number) is deleted as a result of this AfD, then 46664 (concerts) should be moved to simply 46664. Agricolae (talk) 22:24, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Agreed - the disambiguation in the title makes it useless as a redirect. I note, however, that 46664 (song) was once created but was deleted under CSD/G12; 46664 itself might be useful as a dab in itself in the future. Ansh666 22:31, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see what happened. I read the title as 46664 in my mind... anyways, that redirect should be changed to a redirect (or future disambig) to 46664 (concerts); I am fine with delete for this article in question. VQuakr (talk) 05:30, 20 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Insufficiently interesting mathematically (and numerologically) to pass WP:NUMBER. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:34, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.