Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4IndianWoman.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under G11. Clearly non-notable, no mention or trace of being notable, insufficient or reliable sourcing, written in a promotional perspective. Rudget  (Help?) 12:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

4IndianWoman.com

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable per WP:WEB; I can't find any third party coverage, and the only links in the article are to the site. Likely a case of advertising; the creator is User:4indianwoman. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete You can't make articles in your own interest, we already know that. So unless someone steps forward and says, "Hey, I would have written that if they didn't get there first," this should go. M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 04:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable web site. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Have added Uw-coi to user talk page. Richard001 (talk) 04:48, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as pure advertising by someone with a COI. Close to G11 speedy material to be honest. ~ mazca  talk 10:14, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I will give the person the benefit of the doubt and assume good faith. However, I can't find anything that suggests that this website is notable.(Roodhouse1 (talk) 11:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.