Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4Sight (telephony)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 14:41, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

4Sight (telephony)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I found no significant coverage. The company was deleted in AfD at Articles for deletion/4Com. SL93 (talk) 21:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - No notability. Google reveals that every company in existence seems to have its own stake on the term "4sight." {{{sub|C}}  A S U K I T E  T} 00:45, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 9 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:02, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete—Google searches are a mess as this appears to be a commonly used marketing term, but nothing leaps out as showing notability for this company. Without prejudice if sources are found.  Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 17:13, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.