Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4dventure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Editions of Dungeons & Dragons, from merge already done. --Tikiwont 10:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

4dventure

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article covers a marketing term that the publisher only used for several months. The publisher no longers uses it. The core topic (4th edition Dungeons & Dragons) is more appropriately covered at Editions of Dungeons & Dragons along with previous editions. Since 4th edition isn't even published, it's not possible that it's independently noteworthy enough for a stand alone article where the previous editions weren't. . — Alan De Smet | Talk 06:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Editions of Dungeons & Dragons, later if they need a main article, they can create one. --ZacBowlingtalk 06:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect per ZacBowling --Brewcrewer (talk) 08:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * ZacBowling has a good point; since links in historic articles would break, a Redirect is probably a better solution. So I'm no longer in favor of outright deletion.  I'd just do it, but since there is an outstand AfD I'll wait until there is consensus.  I'm not seeing anything in the article as it stands that's really worth Merging. — Alan De Smet | Talk 20:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.