Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4marks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kevin (talk) 02:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

4marks

 * – (View AfD) (View log · AfD statistics)

Non-notable website. Fails the primary criterion - no secondary sources in Google. Traffic rank of ~294,000. Leuko Talk/Contribs 03:47, 4 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong delete No decent sources, very poor article in my opinion DRosin (talk) 11:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Sources can be added, and will be added soon by me, and as this is one of my first articles I am working on improving it still. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.220.174 (talk) 18:08, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Removed due to sockpuppetry. Leuko  Talk/Contribs 16:59, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 22:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The biggest social networking website for Catholics. Don't even think about being "racist" against Catholics!  OmniWikia (talk) 16:34, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please refrain from personal attacks in accusing other editors of racism. Thank you. Leuko  Talk/Contribs 16:59, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. And Catholics are not a race. --Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 17:29, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable - No news or scholarly reference, one book reference (a footnote reference to an article published on 4Marks.com "Porn: The Marriage Wrecker). --4wajzkd02 (talk) 17:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

User:OmniWikia has been blocked 1 month for vandalism and sock puppetry, with 24.118.220.174 being blocked 1 week as a sock puppet. MuZemike 21:05, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.