Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4th Halifax Highland Scout Troop Scots Highland Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  07:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

4th Halifax Highland Scout Troop Scots Highland Company
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable Bduke    (Discussion)  02:58, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I had considerable problem submitting this to AfD as the title of the article had a slash in it, which confused everything. I moved the article to remove the slash and I hope I have fixed up the AfD pages OK. I will check all the other links. OK, to the details. This article has been discussed in relation to a merge at Talk:Scouting and Guiding in Nova Scotia. A paragraph has been added to Scouting and Guiding in Nova Scotia. There was some support for making this a redirect there, but that was also opposed, both the mention there and the redirect. So I decided to bring it here. Individual Scout Troops or Groups are rarely notable and many have been deleted or redirected over the years. This article however covers other ground. It has several references, but none of those that are easily available talk about the troop and the content of this article. As was said on the merge discussion this material is better suited as a full article for submission to a scholarly journal or a historical society journal. I would accept a redirect, but am more inclined to say it should be deleted. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  03:25, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete rather good job of amateur local historical research, but we don't do that. Not actually more notable than any other small such local group. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.