Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5-Hour Energy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

5-Hour Energy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is written like an advertisement. There is asserted notability, but it is unsourced. All of the sources listed are from the producer, so they can't be used. —  Dæ dαlus Contribs  03:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep article quality is no reason for deletion. I am Australian and had never heard of the brand, but found it mentioned in this story, for instance, in about five seconds. Secondary sources will improve the tone definitely. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:59, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep These gnews results are enough to provide notability for me. The article definitely has some editorial issues, but I don't believe it should be deleted. Jujutacular talkcontribs 08:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with the others. This product is notable and well known.  Dakart (talk) 08:25, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 08:36, 27 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. The sources seem to be proving notability, a fast Google search gives several hits (even excluding the product's website). McMarcoP (talk) 09:05, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well-known drink (if you'd call it that); it's hard to find an American gas station that doesn't have these lined up at the counter, or at least it is in the southwest. Advert tone isn't a reason to delete, neither are references from a producer. A simple Google search pulls up plenty of refs. I'd even consider speedy closing this one, myself. 161.13.111.74 (talk) 21:38, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.