Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/500 saves club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Not saved. --- Balloonman  NO! I'm Spartacus! 00:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

500 saves club

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is pointless, considering there are only 2 members of this exclusive club and there will only be 2 members for a number of years. Furthermore, the information in this article is a subset of the much more valuable List of Major League Baseball all-time saves leaders article. Lastly, a template was created to duplicate the content of this article as well. Neither one is needed. Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 21:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence that this "club" exists. andy (talk) 22:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * redirect redirects are cheap and this term has been used a few times in reliable sources. --Chiliad22 (talk) 22:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Pointless--Yankees10 01:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect Duplicative page, as List of Major League Baseball all-time saves leaders clearly covers the same informtion, per nom. - Masonpatriot (talk) 01:17, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:21, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Really what I'm seeing is a WP:NEO. Someone just made up the name and tried repeating it. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Masonpatriot. Rlendog (talk) 16:05, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Cs-wolves  (talk)  04:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with nomination. Sabiona (talk) 15:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No need for this page. --Muboshgu (talk) 22:45, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a neologism. The phrase has been used a couple of times.  But I do not see that this "club" has been discussed by the baseball press.  And lets face it, baseball is stats obsessed and something like this should have more than just a couple of gnews hits. -- Whpq (talk) 12:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Maybe someday, but no where near now. Adam Penale (talk) 21:02, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.