Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/50 Cent's fifth studio album (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While WP:HAMMER is only an essay it does make sense for the most part. That being said, the fact that a single has been released for it already sort of says to me that this album will happen and does not violate WP:CRYSTAL. Secondly it appears to have been named, so there we go.. Kwsn  (Ni!)  15:31, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

50 Cent's fifth studio album
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

The album is untitled, fails WP:CRYSTAL Nicholas (talk) 03:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * DELETE: We have neither a name nor a track list, so this album clearly fails WP:CRYSTAL. Is supposed to come out since nearly 2 years but so far nothing has surfaced. A clear delete.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 20:49, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:HAMMER. When reliable sources provide something more substantial about this album, and when it meets the relevant requirements, and perhaps when they get around to naming it, an article might be appropriate. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NALBUMS, an unreleased album may qualify for an advance article if there is sufficient verifiable and properly referenced information about it and WP:CRYSTAL as the album is notable and almost certain to take place. WP:HAMMER is not an official policy but even that states a future album is an exception if it will contain enough verifiable information for a decent article even if the title is not known. As demonstrated, this article is within policy. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 06:17, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * ??? It seems as though this article was changed to a redirect while AfD was ongoing and is still open. Was this an admin closure that went wrong and left the AfD open? Or did someone WP:CRYSTALBALL what the outcome of discussion would be? For what it's worth, I looked at previous version of article and am on the fence about keep/delete; I just want to be sure AfD procedure is being followed. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:14, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe it was a mistake due to the naming of this AFD. The article itself linked to WP:Articles for deletion/50 Cent's fifth studio album (second nomination) (note the spelling - "second" instead of "2nd") which didn't exist so presumably the editor changed the article under the belief the AFD had been closed. I've now introduced the missing page as a redirect to here. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 06:41, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep and Move to The Eye of the Hustle, as that appears to be the name of the album. That along with other changes made since the start of the AfD are enough to satisfy me that it is no longer a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Trusilver  19:59, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep and Move to The Eye of the Hustle per WP:NALBUMS. I agree that the article is a mess, but ordinary editing should be able to fix this. Changes made since this procedure has begun put the page marginally past the bar for CRYSTAL and NALBUMS. BusterD (talk) 20:26, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Procedural relisting as the original AfD was not listed in the logs.
 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:43, 1 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —  Baseball   Watcher  00:00, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.