Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/50 Cent vs. Cam'ron feud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 (T|C) 09:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

50 Cent vs. Cam'ron feud

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unencyclopedic and non-notable discussion of a disagreement between multiple musicians without attribution or sourcing. The only references given are a series of YouTube links to excerpts from various (probably copyvio) radio programs, and a link to lyrics for one of the discussed songs. Has been tagged for references, notability and context issues for over a month, without being addressed. Risker 02:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Looks like a ploy to generate hype/media attention and the article is helping that cause. Corpx 03:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete "real" or not, Wikipedia is not the place to document/publicise celebrity feuds. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  03:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - no significance asserted. The thing this article is lacking is a "Reaction" section: and there is a reason for that. Namely, the "feud" has not generated much external heat. It has not widely been noted. Grace notes T § 03:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete is there anyone 50 Cent hasn't pissed off? Who cares. JuJube 05:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Hip_hop_rivalry. the_undertow talk  07:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, even though this article is adorably precious. --C.Logan 11:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|15px]] Delete per Corpx Will (is it can be time for messages now plz?) 18:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|15px]] Delete Per WP:BLP and no interest on beginning a East Coast/West Coast type of feud for publicity on a free encyclopedia.  Real96  07:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge This particular feud is notable as explained in this New York Times article but the amount of material is not really worthy of its own article. Much of this can be integrated into the 50 Cent article, which it already is. Spellcast 16:35, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge If a hip-hop feud is mentioned in the NYT it's surely notable. Also, it's doubtful this is a ploy to generate attention... hip hop stars are always feuding and fans follow the story. Calliopejen1 22:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, more garbage utilizing YouTube as a primary source of information. Burntsauce 23:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-encyclopedic and apparently failed ploy to generate record sales. RFerreira 06:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.