Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/50 Classic Cartoons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 00:39, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

50 Classic Cartoons

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

While some of the individual shorts may have notability, this VHS only collection has none. Search only comes up with individual users trying to sell copies on eBay, Amazon, or the like Wolfer68 (talk) 19:34, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no reason that I can see for a directory of what's on a video put together by Anchor Bay Entertainment. This is straight off the back of the box, with a list of titles and no clue as to why any of these are classics.  I've never known anyone to watch one of these for its historical value, although it makes a great babysitter if you have a preschooler.  Mandsford (talk) 20:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This appears to be just one of the many compilations companies release featuring public domain cartoons (meaning they don't have to pay any money to the studio that owns them). No signs that this one is notable.  TJ   Spyke   23:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete In agreement with TJ Spyke -- it is just a non-notable compilation of public domain cartoons. There is no evidence this was a significant video release. Pastor Theo (talk) 23:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Hiding T 11:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - one of the multitude of packages offered by the company (they now have a DVD set of 300 cartoons which is just as unworthy of a Wikipedia article). There is zero review/discussion coverage on reliable media, just listings on various commercial sites. This would be just as non-notable if it had 50 winners of the Academy Awards and had an equal lack of media coverage. B.Wind (talk) 19:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.