Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/50 Squadron SAAF


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 00:34, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

50 Squadron SAAF

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Virtually no content, has not been added to since creation - suggest move to AfC or merge into SAAF Pesky  ( talk  …stalk!) 05:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Userfy  Looks like somebody's sandbox from one 5-minute session, not an article.  North8000 (talk) 10:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep I was just able to expand this to a stub using references available through Googling the squadron. There appears to be more on the squadron in hardcopy books which Google hasn't digitialised. As such, I think that WP:N is met. Nick-D (talk) 04:26, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Article now expanded to valid stub status!  Farawayman (talk) 07:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * OK by me now - that's looking better! Pesky  ( talk  …stalk!) 07:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - subject is notable under WP:GNG as it has received significant coverage in reliable sources. Anotherclown (talk) 11:55, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - reliably sourced. Marokwitz (talk) 15:34, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.