Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/53651 (number) (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

53651 (number)
This was previously nominated for deletion, but the discussion was closed immediately as a bad-faith nomination. Nevertheless, I don't see why this number is especially notable. Although 53652 gets fewer Google hits, 53650 actually gets more. Essentially an internet meme that hasn't made much of a splash. --N Shar 23:43, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This is not a notable number. Insufficient coverage shown in article. GassyGuy 00:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It's just a moderately big number. No evidence of notability. 01:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 03:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. It's not enough to be an encyclopaedic item. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 15:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 22:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete dumb †he Bread  00:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This isnt a forum about obscure internet memes...this is an ecyclopedia... If you want memes, goto www.encyclopediadramatica.com . Otherwise, lets stick to substantial knowledge...--Vox Causa 22:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Veinor 19:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.