Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/54321


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

54321

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG, as far as I can find. Boleyn (talk) 16:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I found these sources for what they are worth. There are no reviews because the film is not released until June 2016 (according to IMDB) --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep perhaps as I was watching this along with all of my other AfDs, seems enough. Draft at best for now until it's set for an acceptable article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep perhaps as I was watching this along with all of my other AfDs, seems enough. Draft at best for now until it's set for an acceptable article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * In looking further:
 * type:,  and
 * year:
 * filmmaker:
 * producer"
 * lead:
 * lead:
 * lead:
 * type: Mainstream Production
 * studio:
 * WP:INDAFD: 54321 Movie Ragavendra Prasad G.V. Kannan Shabeer Arvin Pavithra Mainstream Production

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Being a completed film with production receiving coverage to meet WP:NFF (paragraph 3) even as it awaits its June release. Time to continue improvements over time and through regular editing, not delete. Sorry, it just meets WP:NF IMHO.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  17:37, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Update: to, and  et.al.... The unsourced 3 sentence stub first brought to AFD has benefited by the diligence of others and is now a decently sourced start class article which IMHO now obviously meets WP:NFF (paragraph 3) through having more-than-trivial coverage in multiple reliable sources.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 18:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Change to keep based on work put in and improvements. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for what is essentially a withdrawal. Your return here is appreciated. .  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep As article has been significantly improved since nomination, now clearly meets GNG. Omni Flames   let's talk about it  00:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Though I think it needs to have it's title changed to 54321 (film) to avoid confusion.   Nik ol ai Ho   19:53, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * done. Now at 54321 (film).  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 04:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.