Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/55 (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

55 (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

the album fails the WP:NALBUM the 2 sources cited are interviews that mention the album in passing as being a future album. Domdeparis (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per GNG: Allmusic, Spin, Sputnik, Billboard (one of the songs on the album charted), Rolling Stone, Popjustice, HuffPost (re: 55.5 EP), etc. Yes, the article needs sourcing improvements, but notability is not the issue here. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Additional comment: I still believe the album deserves a standalone article, but the current version has tons of unsourced material. I would be fine with stripping this article down to its bare bones, so keeping the stub for future expansion. There are several articles about songs on the album, which should probably be redirected to the album article. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment It's a shame that the author of the page couldn't be bothered to source his material. He has created lots of pages sourced only to itunes for songs from this album in which he makes no claims to notability not even bothering to mention the charts that they were in (obviously that is an indication that the song might be notable but not enough to guarantee it). I agree for the redirects though. Domdeparis (talk) 19:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:20, 17 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - per Another Believer's sources. I'll warn the article creator to stop making such sloppy articles though. Sergecross73   msg me  16:15, 17 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.