Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5 Star Grave


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

5 Star Grave

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non notable band without coverage in reliable independent sources, fails WP:MUSIC Valenciano (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:MUSIC gives the criterion of two or more releases on a major indie label as satisfying notability. 5 Star Grave has a recent one - on Massacre Records, that along with their inclusion on Last.fm is making me lean towards Keep (but barely) - needs more 3rd party sources and to trim some of the POV. 81M (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete because it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion: CSD A9. Adjkasi  (T | C | L) 13:09, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * CSD A9 is for musical recordings, whereas 5 Star Grave is a band, not a recording. You probably mean A7. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Needs at least a second album released through their current notable label, or an international tour. Last.fm includes every band whose music can be "scrobbled", so it doesn't prove notability, and they have just three thousand listeners on there. Mushroom (Talk) 15:14, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   06:57, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TheSpecialUser  ( TSU ) 08:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 05:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.