Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5 Ways of Conceptualizing Data


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

5 Ways of Conceptualizing Data

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As already tagged, this is somebody's term paper, not a Wikipedia article. Hard to say whether it is original research or just regurgitation of the one source that it is largely based on. Either way it isn't a notable concept supported by reliable third-party sources. Lithopsian (talk) Lithopsian (talk) 20:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 20:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:DEL14, a whole lot of synth, a MOS defying title, and no reliable sources to support that "Five ways of conceptualizing data" should be a notable subject in itself. — Sam Sailor 20:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete — this is original research Anirvan (talk) 21:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete the three people above have summed it up nicely Adamtt9 (talk) 23:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete yet another case of a poor student who takes a class focused on creating new articles, leading to veteran editors spending time deleting them because they do not follow guidelines. W Nowicki (talk) 19:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete – I came to this article because of a link to a dab page, but I agree with the above arguments for deletion. If the article were to be kept, it would require a substantial amount of cleanup. Not that needing cleanup is a reason for deletion, but ....  jmcgnh  (talk)  (contribs)  07:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is a serious lack of sources and agree with the arguments above. Joseffritzl (talk) 11:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Snow - WP:NOTESSAY, WP:OR, WP:DEL14, and per the title, probably also WP:DEL6. Timothy Joseph Wood  14:15, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as my nomination. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:00, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.